Margrave Celmins, P.C. Scottsdale, AZ
January 2017 Bimonthly Newsletter
(Chiricahua National Monument is characterized by its spires and unique rock formations) Photo: © Pete Valentine

Hopefully you’ve recovered from the holidays and are ready to explore some of Arizona’s snowy delights. The Chiricahua Mountains of southeast Arizona contain plant, bird and mammal species from the Chihuahuan and Sonoran deserts, as well as the Rocky and Sierra Madre mountains. Its 17-mile network of trails provide something for everyone.

Our second feature of Who Am I? includes another description of one of the firm’s attorneys, and the first person to guess correctly in an email to me at the address below wins a mention in our next newsletter. It’s an informal way for our clients to get to know their attorneys better.

Be sure to read Michael Kitchen’s article on Attorneys’ Fees this month, as well as a farewell notice about Rick DePonte, and check out a photo taken at our firm’s Christmas luncheon.

Patty Copeland, Editor
Christmas luncheon; from the left Chris Lonn, Lat Celmins, BK Boothe, Mallory Rasmussen, Brittany Crane, Michael Margrave, Patty Copeland, Michael “Kitch” Kitchen, Cheryl Dahlen, Rick Deponte, Linda Suggs; unfortunately, Kathy Allison was absent

We want to wish a fond farewell to one of our long-time partners and attorneys: Rick DePonte. Rick, as they say, was made an offer he couldn’t refuse. We were sorry to lose such a talented P. I. attorney and wish him all the best at his new home: Brown & Engstrand Accident Law Group. Clients can reach him at 602-262-4254 or
I am the firm’s only home-grown Arizona attorney. I tower over my opponents. My favorite book is CHEAPER BY THE DOZEN, and I’m almost halfway to having my own dozen. My seven-figure trial win for an attorney against his former firm has brought me a lot of notoriety with other professionals who have had problems with their former employers.
Commercial litigation can get incredibly expensive, incredibly quickly. In a moderately complex commercial litigation case, it can easily approach $150-200 thousand in fees and costs to get through a full jury trial and post-trial motions. These fees can often exceed the amounts sought in the lawsuit and can become a significant barrier to bringing a claim. Fees can become so substantial that they can eventually start to drive the litigation. So, at the conclusion of the litigation, who will pay these fees?

Generally, in the United States, each side is responsible for paying their own attorneys’ fees and most litigation costs, regardless of who prevails. However, there are exceptions to this general rule. In certain types of cases, the prevailing party will be entitled to seek fees from the losing party. These types of cases are generally identified by statute and vary widely. You will need to consult with your attorney as to whether you will be entitled to seek attorneys’ fees from your opponent if you win (or must pay fees to your opponent if you lose) at the inception of the case.

In commercial litigation, the most common “fee shifting statute” deals with cases “arising out of contract.” If you are a party in a case that arises out of a contract, and you prevail in that case, then you will be entitled to request the court to order the losing party to pay for fees. This statute is found at A.R.S. § 12-341.01. The applicable portion of that statute states as follows:

“In any contested action arising out of a contract, express or implied, the court may award the successful party reasonable attorney fees.”

There are several aspects of this statute that are typically litigated.

First, the action must “arise out of a contract.” This is generally a straightforward matter in a simple breach of contract case, but becomes a more complex question when you are dealing with other claims (such as business torts) that may have a connection to a contract, but are not totally dependent on the contract. Under this circumstance, you will need to consult with your attorney on the likelihood of obtaining fees for these types of claims.

Next, you must be the “successful” party. Often, it is easy to determine who is the successful party, particularly where all or most of the compensation requested is awarded. However, who is the successful party where there were numerous claims that had different winners? Who is the successful party if the winner obtains a fraction of the requested compensation, which is less than the amount that could have formed the basis of a settlement? These issues can become very contentious and are dependent upon the specific facts of the case and its outcome.

Also, the action must be “contested.” This simply means that the defendant must put up some sort of defense to the claim. If the defendant defaults or otherwise does not contest the suit, fees will not be awarded.

The prevailing party may only be awarded “reasonable” fees. The court may determine that the actual amounts you paid were reasonable. However, the court may determine that the amount you are seeking is excessive, and may reduce it. Once again, this issue is frequently disputed, and the losing party will typically attempt to contest the reasonableness of the time spent, the rate charged by the attorney, and the general reasonableness of the fees charged.

Lastly, under this statute, the court “may” award fees. It does not have to. Whether to award fees is entirely up to the court’s discretion, and its decision will typically not be overturned on appeal. While courts will often award fees when requested, they sometimes will not. An award of fees is not guaranteed under this statute.

Michael L. Kitchen
Legal Resources
Instead of hunting around on Google looking for these sites, just log on to
Our Privacy Policy
We recognize the importance of our clients’ trust, and keeping our clients’ information confidential is a high priority. We do not disclose any personal information about our clients. Lawyers have been and continue to be bound by professional standards of confidentiality. We will never share, sell or rent individual personal information with anyone. Information submitted to us is only available to employees managing this information for purposes of contacting you or sending you emails based on your request for information, and to contracted service providers relating to our communications with you. You may unsubscribe if you no longer wish to receive our newsletter.
About Our Law Firm
Margrave Celmins is a member of LawPact®, which is an association of independent, business-oriented law firms in the U.S. and overseas. Currently, there are 53 member firms. This is a terrific resource for clients who have legal matters in other states and abroad. There are 32 states and 24 countries represented by member firms throughout Canada, Mexico, Central and South America, as well as Europe and India.
This newsletter is for informational purposes only. Legal advice is provided only through a formal, written attorney/client relationship agreement.