See what The Center for Election Science is up to with their newsletter.
Donate Now »
Like on Facebook Like Us On Facebook
Follow on Twitter Follow Us On Twitter
YouTube Subscribe to Our Channel
Hi <<First Name>>!
Last month we talked about Oregon when it nearly used approval voting for the second time.

This month we decided to comment on awards ceremonies, as we have in the past. It turns out that many awards don't use very good voting methods.

Naturally, when awards make strange decisions, controversy arises. There looks to have been a vote splitting issue with the Grammy's concerning Beyonce and Beck. And with the Oscars using instant runoff voting with lots of candidates, anything can happen.

What's an award really worth when it has a bad voting method?


  • Want to help us throw the CES brand on online polling? Join us at our Github page here.
  • You can find other opportunities at our volunteer page. We're focusing extra hard at recruiting for accounting as well as university student group coordinators.

Cool Content

Are Award Ceremonies Meaningful?

If an award uses a bad voting method, what's it really worth?

Has the Baseball Hall of Fame learned their lesson since our Deadspin article?

Approval Voting Looks at the News

What would we find if we looked at news sources through the lense of approval voting?

Our work can only continue with

your support.

Have a question? E-mail us at
unsubscribe from this list | update subscription preferences