Copy
World AIDS Day Report
HIV Criminalization in California: Evaluation of Transmission Risk
View this email in your browser
Release
For Immediate Distribution
December 1, 2016

Media Contact:
Noel Alumit, alumit@law.ucla.edu 
Office: 310-794-2332
Cell: 323-828-5554

World AIDS Day:
California's HIV Criminalization Laws are Outdated and Disproportionately Affect Marginalized Communities
93% of Convictions Don't Require Conduct That is Likely to Transmit HIV,
 None Require  Actual Transmission   

LOS ANGELES —  In California, outdated HIV criminalization laws do not reflect the highly effective medical advances for reducing the risk of HIV transmission and extending the quantity and quality of life for people living with HIV. 

HIV criminalization is a term used to describe laws that either criminalize otherwise legal conduct or that increase the penalties for illegal conduct based upon a person's HIV-positive status.  California has four HIV-specific criminal laws.

In HIV Criminalization in California: Evaluation of Transmission Risk, researchers Amira Hasenbush and Dr. Brian Zanoni suggest that these HIV criminal laws in California are not in line with medical science and technology related to HIV and may, in fact, work against best public health practices. 

"Nine out of ten convictions under an HIV-specific criminal law or sentence enhancement have no proof of exposure to HIV, let alone transmission," said Amira Hasenbush.  "No HIV criminal laws in California require transmission for a conviction."

Key findings include:

  • From 1988 until June 2014, 379 incidents resulted in convictions for an HIV-specific felony or sentence enhancement.
    • Of those, 100 percent required no actual transmission of HIV.
    • 98 percent did not require intent to transmit HIV.
    • 93 percent involved no specific allegation of conduct that is likely to have transmitted the virus:
      • Ninety percent of convictions were in solicitation incidents in which it is unknown whether any contact beyond a conversation or an exchange of money was initiated, thus possibly not having any exposure to HIV. 
      • Three percent of incidents involved oral sex, a sex act whose transmission risk is estimated as "low" by the CDC. 
      • Only seven percent of incidents involved vaginal or anal sex by definition of the crime.

HIV criminal laws have been disproportionately applied to sex workers. This has a disproportionate impact on women and people of color. Since solicitation by definition includes survival and subsistence sex work, these laws are also likely to disproportionately impact LGBT youth and transgender women of color.  

Laws that criminalize conduct of a person who knows that they are HIV-positive may disincentivize testing and work against best public health practices. 

XXX

The Williams Institute, a think tank on sexual orientation and gender identity law and public policy, is dedicated to conducting rigorous, independent research with real-world relevance.

 

READ THE REPORT
Share
Tweet
Forward
The Williams Institute
UCLA School of Law
Box 951476
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476


williamsinstitute@law.ucla.edu
williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu






This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
The Williams Institute UCLA School of Law · P.O. Box 951476 · Los Angeles, CA 90095 · USA