Copy
View this email in your browser
STOICISM.DESIGN

Deliberate practice

July 1, 2019

At eight years old my son has now - or has been for awhile and is just more eloquently expressing that he's - been equating skillset with personal value. A few nights ago he handed me this note:

"I just feel not cool because everybody can twist their tongue. I just don't feel cool."

He's talking about how some folks are able to fold their tongue into a little hot dog bun, or like a straw, and right now it's a toss up as to whether he just hasn't figured it out or he's even genetically able.

What this inspired was a talk about how to differentiate between the few advantages genetics give us, which we can't really do anything about - we can't be taller, we have a speed cap, genes define our basic musculature - and literally everything else, and how that latter, larger segment has little to do with innate talent* and everything to do with practice.

You can't skate well because you haven't skated enough; you can't play guitar well because you haven't played enough; you can't dance well because you haven't danced enough.

You can hear the cadence of this maxim. You can't ____ well because you haven't practiced enough.

As we learn to equate skillset with practice, with cause and effect, the formula for improving your craft evolves from some kind of depressive, self-deprecating FOMO -- "I just can't design like she can" -- to an actionable statement of fact: "I can design like she can if I just practice enough."

The term deliberate practice exists to differentiate the "practice" in repetition, doing the same thing day-in and out (which can be an avenue for expertise, if done long enough), from consistent, systematic practice performed to see measured improvement of some metric.

Deliberate practice looks like:
  • playing guitar for at least thirty minutes every day to improve picking speed
  • running every other morning with the deliberate goal to improve your mile time
  • journey mapping once per week to improve your predictive accuracy
  • using a tool like Figma for thirty minutes every day to establish working, fluent knowledge of that tool
  • performing the same code kata every week with the goal of fully understanding every line and nuance
And if we, like my kiddo, are concerned by the disservice we do to ourselves** by lacking a particular skill, then there's only one thing to do: git gud.

* Malcolm Gladwell in Outliers would remind us that it certainly has a lot to do with innate advantage.
** Whether or not lacking a skill actually matters is a different tangent, I think. For instance, a UXer's lack of coding skill probably doesn't actually matter in the market. So feeling that lack of skill may have more to do with FOMO then anything else, and it's the FOMO we should address.
You can see this whole writeup on twitter. Follow @DesignStoic for every daily if you're looking for alternate ways to consume this stuff. Your time is valuable.
 
Craft virtuously,
Michael Schofield

Refer virtuously

I would love your help growing stoicism.design. I put together a little referral program. If folks subscribe using your link https://stoicism.design/?referrer=*|UNIQID|* I can see it was you who referred them aaaaand I'll dream-up some sort of incentive. In the meantime, you can totally get a head start.
Copyright © 2019 Michael Schofield, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp