Ethan Allen Institute

Please Support EAI.
We are only as strong
as you make us!

EAI is a 501c(3) nonprofit, educational organization. Contributions are

Member: $50 - $99
Supporter: $100-$499
Sustaining: $500-$999
Sponsor: $1000
and above

Members receive the monthly newsletter, invitations to all Institute events, periodic email news, and (on request) all publications.
Ethan Allen Institute
PO Box 543 
Montpelier, VT 05601

Thank you!


11-noon Weekdays on
WDEV - AM 550, FM 96.1
Call in: 244-1777 or
Toll Free 1 877-291-8255
Archived Shows &
Weekly Schedule




The Vermont Transparency Project is a joint project of the Ethan Allen Institute and the Public Assets Institute. The site will help you find out important information about how state government raises and spends your money.


LICK to watch
EAI's short documentary film what's happening to Vermont and why. 

Are Your Representatives
Voting for YOU? 

Roll Call Profiles
CLICK to Find Out
with EAI Legislator
Roll Call Profiles



Tom Breuer, Stowe/Wakefield, MA
Catherine Clark, Burlington
John Cueman, Dorset
Milton Eaton, Brattleboro
John Goodrich, St. Johnsbury
Anne McClaughry, Kirby
Jack McMullen, Burlington
William R. Sayre, Bristol
Wendy Wilton, Rutland


Mailing Address
PO Box 543 
Montpelier, VT 05601

Phone: 802-695-1448 
Fax: 802-695-1436 
Rob's Cell: 802-999-8145


Email, General
Rob Roper, President
John McClaughry, Vice President

EAI Launches Carbon Tax Campaign.

            All summer long, VPIRG interns have been knocking on doors, selling Vermonters on the vague idea of a “carbon pricing” scheme for our state. These short presentations are misleading people about what is at stake if Vermont were to actually pass a Carbon Tax (a more accurate term that the one VPIRG people strenuously avoid).
            The VPIRG doorstep presentations do not inform citizens that implementing the carbon tax in Vermont as they propose will add 88¢ to every gallon of gasoline purchased, $1.02 to every gallon of home heating oil or diesel, and 58¢ for propane and natural gas. Instead, they misleadingly promise that the tax will be levied on out-of-state “big oil” companies, without disclosing the fact that these costs will be passed along to you the consumer.
            In order to correct these misleading half-truths, the Ethan Allen Institute has launched an informational radio and social media campaign highlighting the true costs of the Carbon Tax, should it become law in Vermont.
            The timeline for placing a Carbon Tax on Vermonters begins with passage of a bill in 2017, after this November’s elections. As such, now – before this coming election — is the time for Vermonters to become informed about the true details of the Carbon Tax, how it would work, who benefits, and who gets stuck with the bill.
            The Ethan Allen Institute’s radio ad will run on stations throughout the state (Brattleboro, Colchester, Middlebury, Morrisville, Rutland, St. Johnsbury, and Waterbury), and our social media effort begins with a commentary piece by former Weidmann CEO for North American Operations and chairman of the board for Associated Industries of Vermont, and now EAI board member, John Goodrich: The Carbon Tax Would Kill Vermont Jobs.
            Thanks to all who have donated to our campaign fund, dedicated to educating Vermonters about the details and implications of the proposed Carbon Tax for Vermont. There is still time to support and extend this campaign. One sixty second radio spot costs between $25 and $35 to put on the air, so every penny counts. 

Donate online now,
or send a check to: 
Ethan Allen Institute
P.O. Box 543
Montpelier, VT 05601
EAI is a 501c(3) nonprofit, educational organization that neither solicits nor accepts government funding. Contributions are TAX DEDUCTIBLE for businesses and individuals. 

Time to Read and Share EAI Roll Call Profiles!
            EAI’s legislator Roll Call Profiles are (we certainly think) the best tool available for reviewing and understanding how your representatives and senators represent you in Montpelier.
            It’s that time of the election cycle when everybody running for office says they’re for fiscal responsibility, lowering your taxes, creating jobs, and they make promises to do everything in their power if you send them back to get the burden of big government off your back. The Roll Call Profile will let you know if that’s the truth or just the talk.
            The profiles are easy to share with your friends and neighbors, and we hope you will share them! 


John McClaughry

Questions for Candidates 2016
by John McClaughry    
          Election season is upon us, and many incumbent legislators are hoping to slide through to reelection on the basis of party support, name recognition, and their winning personalities. The first-time candidates build their campaigns around their record of civic performance plus a recitation of some of things that they’ll promote – or even fight for – once elected.  These typically include more and better jobs, “an economy that works for everyone”, universal health care, holding down rising taxes, better education at lower cost, stamping out “carbon pollution”, and the like.
          What candidates of all persuasions should welcome, but often don’t, are informed, pointed questions from voters that make them take positions on current issues. Here are a baker’s dozen you might want to pose to those seeking your vote.
... (Read More

Sue Minter Wants to Expand the Sales Tax to Services
By Rob RoperRob Roper     
          At the Tunbridge Fair, Democrat gubernatorial candidate Sue Minter indicated in an interview with WDEV’s Mike Smith that she is in favor of expanding the Vermont state sales and use tax to services. Currently it applies only to goods, with a few exceptions.
          About thirty minutes into show, Smith asked Minter about tax policy, noting that, “Governors Dean, Douglas, and Shumlin avoided raising the personal income tax, sales tax, and corporate income tax because they said it would be damaging to the economy in VT. Would you do the same?.... (Read More)


Carbon Tax Would Kill Jobs
by John Goodrich
          For nearly 38 years I had the privilege to work for one of the most important companies in the Northeast Kingdom. St. Johnsbury-based Weidmann puts bread on the table for 300 families. It was, and is, a mainstay of our local economy.  As a measure of that importance to the local economy over the past 25 years, Weidmann paid directly in salaries and wages more than a  ¼ billion dollars ($250,000,000) to its local employees.
          Thus I am alarmed at the urgent call by activists and political candidates for the imposition of a new “carbon tax” on gasoline, diesel fuel, natural gas, heating oil, propane and other fuels....  (Read More)


October 9. Gun Owners of Vermont is holding a rally for Gun Rights on the State House steps in Montpelier. Noon - 3pm. "Is 2017 The Year You Lose Your Rights, or the year YOU make a stand?"

October 12. EAI president Rob Roper will present "The Carbon Tax: A bad idea for Vermont" to the Jericho/Underhill Republican Town Committee and their guests at the Underhill Town Hall in Underhill Center; starting at 7:00pm. If you would like this or another EAI presentation to come to your organization or community, contact

October 13. EAI president Rob Roper will present "Squeezing Blood from a Gilfeather Turnip: A look at potential tax increases in 2017" in Addison County (Time/Place TBD). If you would like this or another EAI presentation to come to your organization or community, contact

November 7. EAI president Rob Roper will present "Squeezing Blood from a Gilfeather Turnip: A look at potential tax increases in 2017" to the Montpelier Rotary Club, 12:15 pm at the Capitol Plaza in Montpelier. If you would like this or another EAI presentation to come to your organization or community, contact
News & Views
EAI's News & Views: An eclectic collection of notable items from just about anywhere.
Vermont Has 3.9 Billion in Debt. “A new report from a government accounting watchdog group finds that Vermont has a debt of $3.9 billion, despite claims of having a balanced budget. The Financial State of the States 2015 report, released this month by Chicago-based Truth in Accounting, debunks the myth that states balance their budgets. Unlike most financial accounting done by states, TIA’s accounting method tracks unfunded pension debt and unfunded retiree health care debt…. Divided among Vermont taxpayers, the $3.9 billion debt results in $17,200 that each taxpayer owes to the state’s treasury.” (Watchdog, 9/27/16)

Auditor Finds Fraud in VT Welfare Programs. “The findings suggest the state gave away $1.8 million in benefits to ineligible Vermonters…. "It's s not uncommon for beneficiaries who are receiving benefits from 3SquaresVT to also receive benefits from another two programs that are not typically investigated, so the $1.8 million figure is probably low," says State Auditor, Doug Hoffer. (VT Digger, 9/14/16)
Government More Inefficient Than Private Sector in Delivering Healthcare. In a recent debate focusing on healthcare, Phil Scott noted that the administrative costs of running government healthcare programs is about 15 percent – more than twice the administrative costs of private insurers, which is about 6%. Scott also pointed out that administrative healthcare costs have increase by $100 million over the past six years. If you will recall, LOWERING administrative costs by having government take over healthcare was supposed to be the source of tremendous savings. Not so much! (Source: VT Digger, 9/24/16)
Sales Tax on Services Will Hit Elderly Hardest. A person commenting on a left-wing blog noted the disproportionate impact expanding the sales tax to services would have on older Vermonters. “It’s us old folks who would be hit hardest by a service tax, because there are so many things we can no longer do for ourselves: plow snow, mow grass, haul and lift big things, etc. Given the aging of Vermont’s population and its overall income profile, that would be a very regressive tax.” Good point!
Businesses Reeling from Years of Tax Increases. “It’s clear businesses are feeling the cumulative impact of increased taxes and mandates over the last several years and need to absorb these changes before adding more. This is consistent with voters putting the economy as their top issue in this election year,” Betsy Bishop, president of the Vermont Chamber of Commerce, (Addison Eagle, 9/2/16)
Who’s Leaving Vermont (And With How Much)? For years some have pointed out that the notion rich people are fleeing Vermont is a myth because IRS data shows that more dollars move into Vermont each year than move out. That trend is no more. UVM economist Art Woolf has analyzed the recent data. He notes that within the 55 to 65-year-old age group 20 percent more families moved out (1,045) as moved in (847), and that these folks account for most of the net loss in tax filers in Vermont. “What about taxpayers earning over $75,000? … [N]early as many people moved into Vermont as moved out—out-migrants outnumber in-migrants by only 100 people.  But in that income group, people moving out took with them $78 million more in income than people moving in earned.  That is, middle and high income people moving out of Vermont tend to be richer than people moving in.” (Burlington Free Press, 9/15/16) We’ve got to do a better job of keeping these people here.
Shumlin Last Play: Take Over Medicare Dollars. “What President Obama and I really want to see is a system where Medicaid, Medicare, private pay, everybody, pays our providers based on keeping folks healthy, instead of quantity of care, fee-for-service care,” Shumlin says.  (VPR, 9/12/16)
Wind Subsidies. “The Government Accountability Office counted in 2013 that there are 82 federal wind programs benefiting wind power, spread across nine agencies that spend a combined $2.9 billion a year on the subsidies. The largest and most direct of these is the $23 per megawatt-hour production tax credit, which allows companies to profit from negative prices.” –Tyler McNeal (Master Resource, 9/15/16)
Scott Wants to Ban Ridgeline Wind. “I’m in favor of a complete ban on ridgeline development,” Scott said to much applause. “It’s very divisive, and we just don’t need that in Vermont. We need to come together, because I feel as though we need to be focusing on the economy, we need to focusing on jobs, we need to be focusing on other things besides this.” (Watchdog, 9/9/16)
Regulating the Monster. “[The Green Mountain Care Board’s] job will become far more difficult beginning in 2017, when the first statewide integrated system goes live: managing 14 individual hospitals is hard enough; keeping a lid on the market power of a single unit that subsumes most of them will be incomparably harder.” – Hamilton Davis health blog (9/15/16) We drive our providers into the coming All Payer “integrated system”, then wonder how our regulators can work their will on this monster.
CO2 Crisis in Perspective. “Statewide greenhouse gas emissions are estimated at 8.37 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent (MMTCO2e) per year. Vermont forests remove an estimated 8.23 MMTCO2e per year.” Bottom line, Vermont contributes little net C02 to the atmosphere.” – Tom Pelham, (Tue North 9/14/16)
Implicit Bias and Cultural Re-Training. “Wait. What? If we’re all biased, who’s training whom? Let’s be very clear: When it moves from abstract to concrete, all this talk about “implicit bias” gets very sinister, very quickly. It allows radicals to indict entire communities as bigoted, it relieves them of the obligation of actually proving their case, and it allows them to use virtually any negative event as a pretext for enforcing their ideological agenda.” – David French, National Review

Book of the Month

Book of the Month: The Hockey Stick Illusion
Climategate and the Corruption of Science 
by A.W. Montford
Stacey International, 2010
                  The Hockey Stick Illusion; Climategate and the Corruption of Science, is a still unfolding, true, fully referenced, modern-day who-dun-it science history for those wishing to understand and assess the solidity of the “Climate Change” hypothesis. It is a rollercoaster ride that reveals and examines “the Hockey Stick affair,” and an aspect of scientific research that is said by many to be the most important of our time, CAGW (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming) or “Climate Change.” In Vermont, we see the impacts of this developing science as told through the media and enacted into law in the form of urgently erected industrial wind turbines on delicate uplands and photovoltaic arrays installed over agricultural fields as we race to eliminate fossil fuels from our energy portfolio.
            The “Hockey Stick” itself is the graph of a remarkable “discovery,” the global temperature “reconstruction” made by climatologist Dr. Michael Mann and published in Nature in 1998. It shows an “uptick” (claimed to track industrial activity increase) in modern-day global temperatures. Those temperatures are coded into tree rings (temperature proxies) of trees old enough to have recorded that information over the study time period, in this case, from about 1400 to present. The graph is the output of a complex, sometimes ad-hoc, statistical technique applied to the noise-infused and uncertain tree ring data to attempt to extract a meaningful global temperature signal.
            Montford follows the work of Steven McIntyre, a talented mathematician and semi-retired Canadian mining engineer, as he became interested in climate science and tried to reproduce Dr. Michael Mann’s graph…as science invites anyone to do. A simple enough task one would think. Here is where the rollercoaster ride begins and before the ride is over the reader will have a new, critical understanding of the unusual, insular and uncertain world of paleoclimatology.
            McIntyre became interested in the Hockey Stick because of what he’d learned of the statistical routine used to generate the graph. Montford writes of McIntyre and hockey stick graphs, “Hockey sticks were a well-known phenomenon in the business world and McIntyre’s contacts had seen far too many dubious mining promotions and dotcom revenue projections to take such a thing seriously.”
            The Hockey Stick Illusion presents a rare and surprising view of paleoclimate (ancient climate) science and climatology-IPCC relationships. It offers critical windows to the way climate science is done and the odd way it is peer reviewed. Key excerpts from the Climategate email releases of 2009 further document the story of Dr. Mann’s graph as well as of other contemporary temperature reconstructions, Steven McIntyre’s attempt to reproduce them and the effort climatologists made to keep their work from being examined. Exposed, too, is the climate community’s networking and its influence on the IPCC process (and vice versa) and how key scientific journals such as Nature, Climatic Change, and Geophysical Research Letters, determine what gets published. 
            As you read, keep this in mind: Science has been called “our one source of objective knowledge.” It is a process designed to produce basic, testable knowledge about how our universe works. It is designed especially to exclude “confirmation bias,” the difficult-to-avoid tendency of a researcher to color findings per a preconceived idea or desire. Obviously, anathema to the scientific process is agenda, which is the realm of activism. Key in the scientific process is making freely available to other researchers all data and resources used so that the initial results can be independently verified or falsified.
            If you need to know about Climate Change and climate science—and we all should—you must read this book. The ride is worth the read.

- Review by Paul Kenyon, a member of the Ethan Allen Institute
Final Thoughts

October Survey

Should the next Governor/Legislature Expand Vermont's Sales and Use Tax to Services, and lower the overall rate from 6 percent to 4.75%?

          I don't know.

CLICK HERE to take the survey. 

September Survey Results

What priorities should the next governor focus on for Vermont?

Raise the minimum wage to $15? - YES (12.12%) or NO (87.88)
Make Vermont more affordable? - YES (96.34%) or NO (3.66%)
Gun control? - YES (6.67%) or NO (93.33%)
Education finance reform and lowering property taxes? - YES (96.36%) or NO (3.64%)
Lowering Vermont's Carbon Footprint? - YES (10.69%)  or NO (89.31%)
Spurring private sector job growth? - YES (96.36%) or NO (3.64%)



Copyright © 2016 Ethan Allen Institute, All rights reserved.